The razing of Melos, and the selling of its inhabitants into slavery, was not a ” Strutture e funzione del dialogo in Tucidide e in PseudoSenofonte”, In , La . El diálogo de los melios es un pasaje perteneciente al Libro V () de la Historia de la Guerra del Peloponeso, escrita por el historiador griego Tucídides. Přečtěte si nejlepší citáty od autora Tucídides. Para el político ateniense homónimo, véase Tucídides. Tucídides fue un h.
|Published (Last):||22 January 2007|
|PDF File Size:||19.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Athenians laid siege to the city and withdrew most of their troops from the island to fight elsewhere. Thucydides himself later makes it clear that the Spartans felt uneasy about their own conduct in beginning the war 7.
The ancient critics sometimes deplored its difficult style and peculiar arrangement, explaining how Thucydides should have written the introduction to his work. For a recent survey of the evidence see M. During the Cold War it had been easy to read Thucydides as the recorder, perhaps even the advocate, of a law of the stronger. Chapters 7 through 65 of the book focus increasingly on Pericles and his leadership of Athens during the opening years of the war and indirectly on more general problems of political leadership.
Approaching the problem in this way we can speak at least in general terms about the audience envisioned by the Histories.
The address of the Corinthian delegates is fresh and surprising in its strategy and introduces a theme of recurring importance in the Historiesthe contrast between Athenian and Spartan character.
To succeed in a plot was to have a shrewd head, to divine a plot a still shrewder; but to try to provide against having to do either was to break up your party and to be afraid of your adversaries.
On the Athenian side as well, the narrative eventually imposes qualifications and nuance. Sen mid, Geschichte der grieckiscken Literatur I, vol.
Batalla de Melos – Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
The label “Archaeology” is inappropriate in so far as it suggests the unearthing of whatever remains from the past; Foucault’s use of “Archaeology” to mean “the history of that which renders necessary a certain form of thought” comes much closer to making the term appropriate for this section,20 tor it analyzes forces that have long operated in Greek history and that are likely still to be evident in the great war that he has chosen for his subject.
I could read Thucydides with an understanding and a fullness of response that hitherto had seemed impossible. Two features of the passage are especially difficult to bring over in English: The point is driven home in an elaborate contrast between Athenian and Spartan character: If you allow two to combine into one and if the Corinthians beat us, you will have both the Corcyrean and Peloponnesian navy to fight against.
Unitarian critics have inculcated a respect for the text as it is, rather than as it might have been at some earlier stage in the author’s career.
We find out whether the Spartans can achieve this goal by watching the conflict between two of the major figures of the djalogo book, Pericles of Athens and King Archidamus of Sparta.
What dee the Athenians made a concession, such as the repeal of the Megarean decree? If they fail in some attempt, they fill the gap with new hopes.
It contained the following section: Contemporary uses of this verb and its cognates refer for the most part to technical works or those with few literary pretensions.
Siege of Melos – Wikipedia
The most illuminating Thucydidean studies were works such as John Finley’s that emphasized the fundamental unity and coherence of the work. And when they did not meet him when he was at Eleusis and the Thriasian plain, he made a probe by remaining at Acharnae seeing if they would come out against him.
There are, to be sure, signs of dialovo agreement earlier in the Histories, e. This statement is a dramatic development of the themes in the opening paragraphs of the work. The essential point, however, is clear; Thucydides tucididez used different methods for 28 Book I crucial word, epexelthon, I have rendered colloquially, tucidires “went after,” trying to catch its military overtones cf. Kinesis is an unusual word at this point in the development of Greek, clear enough in general meaning but obscure and surprising in this context.
Macaulay’s essay, “History,” originally in the Edinburgh Review forreprinted in F. Logically and chronologically this first assembly at Sparta should be followed by the convention of the allies and the vote of the Peloponnesian League to go to war, that is by chapters Xialogo is implied by Herodotus 7. In a constitutional sense his powers were very limited, though his influence was great. Self-interest, the desire for profit, and even fear lead to the growth of power and security in Greece 17 1.
We have seen the counterexamples of individual leaders such as Pausanias and the campaigns of Brasidas, all of which serve to give shading and tone to the initial contrast. Several online sources, such as the official tourism website of Melossay it tcuidides two years. See Gomme in HCT on 1.
What were the attitudes, values, and assumptions of thatreadership? Thoukydides Athenaios; the modesty of the verb of reporting: At a material level, naval supremacy is the primary route to power in Greek history and the Athenian naval empire is the culmination of a process that reaches back to Minos.
When tucodides form a plan and it does not succeed, they think they have been deprived of their own property, but when their aggression results in gain, they think they have accomplished little in comparison to what will happen in the future.
But I can be quite precise about the moment when I began to yucidides about Thucydides in a new way. Although these challenges to tradition are most evident fe the Sophistic movement, they are surely not restricted to these itinerant teachers and their pupils.
The dating of this treatise continues to be disputed though the case for a dan: But beyond this, two other aspects are developed in tuicdides narrative of the episode. The Corinthian delegates are represented as concerned less with attacking the Athenians than with chastising the Spartans for their slowness to act and reluctance to take firm measures against the expansion of Athenian power.
Hence we approach the next section of the work with a new set of questions in mind. They vote to support Sparta and to go to war. An implicit strategy might work when one yucidides depended on explicit affirmations or direct statements might prove inert.